Introduction: What and how does Landlessness mean?
The MST is giving shape to an affective, cultural identity - Landlessness -
that mediates much of the cultural heterogeneity and symbolic production of
diverse communities in Brazil. Performing and plastic arts are two fields of
creative expression in the movement through which MST activists are defining and
negotiating Landlessness as a cultural identity. The plays, dances,
paintings, and sculpture produced by MST activists and the process of cultural
canon formation through the selection of these texts for circulation and
consumption in the movement produce a set of markers of identity. These
markers help us to understand Landlessness as an identity beyond a simple
material or structural condition defined literally as the lack of access to land
as the means of production and social reproduction in the countryside. How
do cultural producers of the MST attempt to construct an affirmative Landless
identity through class, ethnic, regional, aesthetic, spiritual,
historical/temporal, gendered, and philosophical referents, among other
possibilities? One of the endeavors of post-colonial and cultural studies
is the exposure of the tension between singularity and plurality and that dogs
attempts, including both populism and nationalism, to (re)construct cultural
identities as fulcrums of social transformation. How does the MST, as
revealed within, for example, its plays and paintings, navigate that
tension? That is, how does the movement’s artistic production
portray Landlessness as a centralizing, purist discourse and Landlessness as a
decentralized, pluralist category of mediation of multiple dimensions of
marginalized difference?
Beginning to approach the symbolic production of Landless identity through an
overview of performing and plastic arts, my analysis will draw from two
theoretical concepts that explore the relationship between cultural identities,
artistic production and counter-hegemonic political subjectivities. First,
the notion of ìrevolutionary romanticism,î as defined generally by
Michael Löwy and Robert Sayre and further developed by Marcelo Ridenti more
specifically to narrate the sort of apogee of nationalist-populist cultural
politics and production of leftist artists, intellectuals, and movements of the
1960s in Brazil. Löwy and Sayre reject the largely reductionist
connotations of romanticism as naive, idealist, backward-looking and lacking any
political realism - meanings sustained by both capitalist and anti-capitalist
advocates of a stage-theory modernization exclusively defined by positivist,
instrumental rationality. Instead, they propose a more complex typology of
romanticisms, spanning attitudes and political projects ranging from
restitutionist/monarchist to fascist to utopian revolutionary.[1] They offer further analysis and typology
of revolutionary romanticisms[2],
understanding them as different articulations of a critique of capitalist
modernity through a remembrance and valorization of the past. This past,
differently recalled by the different articulations of revolutionary
romanticism, is viewed as pointing toward a more just, egalitarian, and
humanitarian future. Revolutionary romanticisms propose alternative
modernities based upon (the reinvention of) ìpastî or
ìdisappearingî values and traditions. These lost or
threatened values are identified by the authors as including, for example,
community, gratitude, charity, harmony with nature, work as art, and enchantment
with life. (Ridenti 2000, 60).
In the context of Brazil, Ridenti argues that revolutionary romanticism is a
key dimension to many artists and movements that mark the country’s
twentieth century cultural history. For example, Brazilian modernist
writer Oswald de Andrade proposed in the late 1920s that the nation could
overcome the legacies of colonialism through a cultural subjectivity he called
the ìtechnologized barbarian.î That is, through a
conjugation of the radical, otherness of Brazil’s pre-Eurocentric
cultures with the technological advancements of industrial modernization,
Brazilians could break free of cultural and economic dependency and arrive at an
emancipatory, utopian, and truly post-colonial future. During the early
1960s, artistic currents closely associated with a Marxist analysis of social
reality and thus self-identified as the inheritors of illuminist reason - for
example, the Teatro de Arena, the Popular Centers of Culture, and
Cinema Novo - actually shared a number of characteristics of
romanticism. According to Ridenti:
ìThey proposed in-dissociation between art and life; they were
nationalists, as they valued the historical and cultural past of the people;
the sought out popular roots that would serve to mold the future of a free
nation, to be constructed - a genuinely Brazilian utopia, placing art at the
service of causes challenging the present order.î (57)
Therefore, my readings of the symbolic production of Landless identity will
focus on tracing the re-articulation and transformation of the philosophical and
aesthetic legacies of Brazilian ìrevolutionary romanticismî.
How does the fusion of a romantic search for popular roots and the illuminist
ideal of progress find expression in performance and plastic arts in the
MST?
Secondly, in an attempt to clarify more precisely the degrees of
transformation through the MST of the Brazilian nationalist-populist
articulation of such revolutionary romanticism that punctuated the
intellectual/cultural fields of the 1960s, I will focus on the relationship
between genre, canon formation, and the notion of cultural
democratization. Among the focus of (self-)critiques of the various
manifestations of leftist political and cultural activity of the 1960s in Brazil
was the nearly exclusive privileging of the People and the Nation as
emancipatory subjectivities. Due to the loading of discursive power into
these two floating signifiers, the production of meaning of any subaltern (thus
ìpopularî) group or individual was often recognized or recognizable
only as national allegory. Arguably, in the context of the rise of
Third-Worldism and the de-colonization struggles that marked the 1960s, the
People and the Nation might be defended as the moment’s necessary
ìstrategic essentialisms,î to use Gayatri Spivak’s term.
However, it has since largely been recognized that their relatively
monologic (in)definition through middle-class, intellectual vanguardism tended
to muffle other dimensions, complexities and ambiguities of subaltern difference
and potentially emancipatory subjectivities. In the more extreme cases, it
led to the patronizing, authoritarian dismissal of the dynamics and values of
local, popular cultures and knowledges except as raw material to be re-made by
an enlightened, tutelary, revolutionary vanguard. This was a moment of
pedagogical discourses of the popular and the national that largely overshadowed
or erased the performance of those and a multiplicity of other identities.
Therefore, in order to understand the transformations of this
populist-nationalist legacy in the cultural production of the MST, I will
attempt to re-frame it within the tension between pedagogical and
performative discourses of counter-hegemonic identity, first proposed
by Franz Fanon and later re-visited by Homi Bhabha. In considering the
construction or narration of a collective, counter-hegemonic identity -
Landlessness - that is taking place in the MST, in part through recourse to the
identitarian monoliths of the Nation and the People, the dialectic between the
pedagogical and the performative can help us to estimate the degrees of
grassroots, participatory democratization of Brazilian revolutionary romanticism
that the movement is achieving. Bhabha defines the performative in the
words of Fanon: it is ìthe fluctuating movement that the people
are just giving shape to.î He continues:
ìThe present of the people’s history, then, is a practice
that destroys the constant principles of the national culture that attempts
to hark back to a ëtrueí national past, which is often
represented in reified forms of realism and stereotype. Such
pedagogical knowledges and continuist national narratives miss the
ëzone of occult instability where the people dwellí
(Fanon’s phrase).î (152)
That is, the collective identity of people in movement is constantly defined
and re-defined through the de-centralized, performative dimensions of their
being in movement, in the micro-histories of the present. People are, but
they are not only, what they are told they are. Pedagogical discourses of
identity attempt to provide stable, fixed images and narrations of who and how
people should be (in order to be, say, Brazilian or male or Black or Christian,
etc.). The notion of the performance of identity allows for the
recognition of the power of people to constantly re-create and redefine the
meanings of those identity. In terms of cultural production, the tension
between the performative and the pedagogical is akin to the distinction that
Teixeira Coelho draws between cultural action and cultural fabrication.
While cultural fabrication emphasizes and values a finished product, a stable
text, cultural action privileges the process of cultural production, and the
conditions of participation of individuals in that process.
In the case of the MST, the cultural construction of Landless identity
involves both pedagogical and performative discourses. Landlessness, in
its cultural, affective dimensions and meanings, can be better understood by
attention to the dialectic between the more centralizing, pedagogical, linear
narrations of the History of the Brazilian peasantry and the movement itself and
the more decentralizing, spontaneous, performative cultural manifestations of
activists that give to and take from Landlessness meanings from and for their
quotidian identity and their personal and family histories. In what
follows, I will argue that this dialectic between the pedagogical and
performative representations/constructions of Landless identity operates
differently within and between different genres and practices of cultural
production in the MST, from the mística to theater, from mural
painting to collage.
Performing Arts
Performance, the uses of the body in determined natural or human environments
to consciously create meanings that transcend their immediate function and
location in terms of time and space, is at the very essence of the construction
of Landless identity. The MST’s most well-known and practiced
tactics of direct action - the cutting of fences, the occupation of unused
farmlands, public buildings and plazas, the protest marches in two orderly
columns, the raising of flags and crosses, and the gestures of strength and
defiance incorporating the tools of peasant work - all have developed a sort of
theatricality, sometimes solemnly religious or even militaristic[3], sometimes joyfully carnivalesque. These
genres of performance have become quite familiar to Brazilian society at large,
although their mediation through the fragmenting gaze of television and
newspapers largely has attempted to reduce the transcendent meanings to a select
few: violence, disorderliness, chaos, and lawlessness. Apart from
the common marginalizing socio-economic conditions that face the Landless across
Brazil, these controversial tactics are perhaps the most centralizing dimension
to their collective identity.
In addition to these types of collective and explicitly politicized
mobilizations, the MST has been a significant site for the development of other
performance genres, including the mística, dance, and
theater. These genres are obviously quite different in nature than the
repertoire of direct action tactics cited above. They are spaces and
moments for reflection upon the conditions leading to and the meanings of those
other dramatic actions, connecting them to the quotidian realities lived by
activists both before and after their entrance in the movement.[4]
The Mística
A debate on federal agricultural policy in Brasília in April 2001 led
by one of the MST’s most prominent, national-level organizers,
João Pedro Stedile, was opened by a short mística that
drew the connection between education, sustainable rural development, and food
security for the country. Before the panelists took their seats, young
activists silently laid out two rows of multiple, alternating copies of two MST
publications - a biography of Paulo Freire and a collection of drawings and
essays by Landless children celebrating the movement’s 15th anniversary -
forming a green and white path on the floor. Then, as one activist read a
poem by Pedro Tierra[5], others
slowly walked the length of the path carrying handmade baskets filled with the
ìproducts of agrarian reformî - other books, jars of preserves,
cartons of milk, packages of organic seeds, fresh fruits and vegetables,
bouquets of flowers - that they then set down to form a colorful altar.
The mística in this sense refers to a specific genre of
symbolic production that has developed and spread along with the spatialization
and territorialization of the movement. Themística has
its origins in the types of ritual developed by Base Ecclesiastical Communities,
that through their practice of Liberation Theology opened a space for the
symbols and narratives of the local communitiesí cultures and histories.
The MST uses similar forms of ritual performance to open its collective events
and meetings - whether on occupations or at national-level congresses. The
místicas are solemn moments for reflection on meanings and
directions the Landless share or are constructing together. The
místicasmay include many or just a few performers. They
may involve the incorporation of any combination of props, such as the
movement’s iconography - the flag, t-shirts, wide-brimmed straw hats or
red baseball caps -, agricultural tools such as hoes and sickles, the reading of
a poem or the performance of a song, choreographed gestures, the placing of
flowers or symbols of the movement’s accomplishments - fruits, milk,
vegetables, bread, seeds, books, etc. - in areas of the fixed or improvised
performance space. Sometimes the místicas are elaborate
explorations of a particular theme such as education or organic agriculture,
homages to certain moments or figures that ground the MST as historical
continuity, or representations of local, state, or regional cultural identities
and traditions. Other times they are more simple, involving a careful
placement of evocative objects as a sort of offering or momentary alter,
accompanied by a reading of a poem, performance of the movement’s hymn or
the national anthem, or, in Landless communities whose organization is more
grounded in Liberation Theology or another strong religious identity, a prayer
or passage from the Bible.
During the National Week of Brazilian Culture and Agrarian Reform, a
more eleborate mística involving at least thirty participants
opened a discussion on the composition of the mass media and entertainments
industries in Brazil and their presence in and representation of rural
communities. The performance was divided into two parts. During the
first part, to a soundtrack of English language pop music, a number of activists
costumed as urban youth in baggy hip-hop or revealingly tight funk
carioca fashion, as sensationalist television hosts, as advertising
industry executives, as Uncle Sam, etc., paraded and danced around the stage
with oversized props representing the penetration of transnational, urban-based
youth culture and consumerism into the Brazilian countryside:
MacDonald’s hamburgers, Nike sweatshirts, televisions broadcasting MTV,
CNN, and Globo, Marlboro cigarettes, and handguns. The spectacle was then
interrupted by a line of young activists, wearing straw hats and red MST
t-shirts and marching with their fists raised. The soundtrack changed to
a live, acoustic viola caipira (peasant guitar), and the marchers were
followed by more performers representing different manifestations of
ìtraditionalî or ìpopularî culture from Brazil:
the boi bumbá (or dancing bull), saci (a one-legged,
pipe smoking, Black trickster of Brazilian folklore), mamulengo
puppets, Lampião (a social bandit who led an outlaw campaign
against landowner and government authoritarianism in the Brazilian Northeast
interior during the 1930s), capoeira (an Afro-Brazilian martial
art/dance form), musicians, as well as examples of paintings and
handcrafts. This entourage of bearers of Brazilian popular culture
eventually drove off the stage the representatives of the culture industry and
then led the public in singing the Brazilian national anthem, asserting a
connection between the National and the Popular against the threat of continued
cultural imperialism.
The mística as a genre of symbolic production in the MST
reveals the tension between performative and pedagogical dimensions. It is
a cultural manifestation that stresses centralizing symbols of Landless identity
and history - the MST and Brazilian flag, anthems and slogans, references to
religious and military solemnity and discipline, relationships between
individuals, nature, and property, etc. However, it is a form that invites
local participation and adaptation, allowing for the expression of cultural
differences that exist within the movement through the incorporation of
ethnically or regionally specific clothing, music, foods, and folklore and the
exploration of the immediate themes or conditions faced by a particular grouping
of Landless activists. Certainly, more thorough, comparative
documentation and analysis of the uses of the mística throughout
Brazil, in different regions and contexts - occupations, settlements,
congresses, etc. - would lead to a more precise hypotheses regarding its
pedagogical and performative dimensions as a cultural practice in the MST.
It is important to note that Mística is also a term used in
the MST in a much broader sense than this specific genre of meaning
production. The MST, in the formulation of a cultural politics for the
movement led by the Culture Sector, adopts an inclusive rather than exclusive
definition of culture, drawing upon the work of Alfredo Bosi and Raymond
Williams, among others. Bosi, a literary critic and cultural historian, in his
quite monumental contribution to Brazilian cultural historiography, The
Dialectic of Colonization (A dialética da
colonização), traces the material dimensions of culture,
through the word’s land-related etymology.
The word culture is derived from the Latin verb colo, meaning
I live, I occupy the land. It is also derived from the past
tense form, cultus, that has two meanings: that which was
worked on the land, cultivated; and that which was worked below ground,
occult, burial of the dead, ritual in honor of ancestors.
Cultus is a sign that the society that produces its food already
has memory[6].
Ademar Bogo, for example, one of the founders and main theorists and poets of
the MST’s culture sector, defines the movement’s cultural politics
by reference a broad notion of popular culture. Bogo’s definition
of popular culture reveals similarities with the revolutionary romanticism
described by Ridenti, as it ties the search for roots - the connection to the
past - with the building of a new future:
ìPopular culture uses symbols, feelings and the spoken word tied
to concrete action. It is connected to signs in order to be
materialized in historical knowledge. Culture, in its anthropological
definition is ëthe combination of ways of being, living, thinking,
speaking of a given social formation.í [Bosi’s definition]
Thus, its expansion takes place less in written form than in oral,
visual, sentimental forms, etc.; thus, we believe in this cultural
resistance of the refuse of capital, as a determining factor for the
re-taking of the struggle for the land, in the search for the re-tying of
physical and sentimental roots.î (Bogo 21)
Further evidence of this broad notion of culture was displayed during the
National Week of Brazilian Culture and Agrarian Reform, a series of
cultural events and debates organized in March 2002 by the MST Culture Sector
and Rio de Janeiro State University. For example, in a plaza on the
university campus, Landless activists built a brick oven and demonstrated the
traditional method of making manioc flour and tapioca cakes. The oven
became a sort of hearth, around which people spontaneously gathered between
other events to tell stories and jokes or recite poems.
The more general notion of the mística in the movement
similarly encompasses a broad range of activities that might be generally
understood as conscious symbolic production that gives meaning and direction to
individual and group affiliation in the movement. The
mística, in addition to the specific form of cultural production
described above, thus can refer to a significant dimension of the organically
rooted organizational philosophy of the MST, apparently differentiating it from
the traditional left movements, where class solidarity was exclusively
prioritized and defined by rational interests, largely rejecting the spiritual,
the affective, the transcendental dimensions to human behavior in and commitment
to struggles for social transformation.[7]
Theaters of the Oppressed
It is likely that the first experiences with different forms of theater in
MST communities derived from the more elaborate practices of the
mística, in which representations of landmark events in the
history of the movement or of peasant resistance in Brazil are
choreographed. There are also multiple, local experiences of popular
festivals and religious celebrations - such as the previously mentioned
boi-bumbá (dancing bull), casamento caipira (peasant
wedding), carnival, and the Passion play - that involve staging, costume,
narrative, dialogue, and choreography, generally constitutive elements of formal
theater.
Through the initiative and interest of groups of Landless activists, a number
of new experiences with theater have developed on particular land reform
settlements, some with support in the form of training and resources from
outside groups and individuals. For example, in the southern states of Rio
Grande do Sul and Paraná, two settlement-based theater groups were formed
and entered into partnerships with secretaries of culture, drama professors, and
professional theater groups. The Life in Art Theater Group (Grupo
Teatral Vida em Arte) was formed in 1998 by 16 farmers, ages 12 to 32, from
the Rondinha Land Reform Settlement in Jóia, Rio Grande do Sul.
After its independent formation, the group began a series of workshops with a
professional actor supported by the Rio Grande do Sul State Secretary of
Culture. With the objective of developing the critical and creative
capacity of the participants and arriving at a collectively authored text and
performance, the eight month-long series of workshops involved body awareness
exercises, improvisational games, set and prop design, and the research and
adaptation of texts, gestures, and objects expressive of the daily reality of
the settlement. In April 2000, the Life in Art Theater Group performed its
first authored play, Return to the Earth, a drama incorporating
carnivalesque elements of popular theater, such as stilts, banners, and a
musical narration. It was performed for their own community, on
the Rondinha settlement, with MST activists and farmers from nearby settlements
also in attendance. Return to the Earth explores the lives of a number
of individuals who, dispossessed from the land, find each other in an urban
plaza. There is a father desperate to find his runaway daughter who is
considering turning to prostitution, a young man struggling to get by as a
street vendor, and another that decides that dealing drugs is his best option
for survival. As they reflect upon their circumstances in a difficult and
dehumanizing urban context, they begin to realize that by returning to the
countryside they may be able to re-construct their dignity, hopes for a better
life, and respectful relationships with others.
In Paraná, through a partnership with the International Festival of
Londrina (FILO), 17 farmers aged 12 to 60 from the Dorcelina Folador Land Reform
Settlement in Arapongas began a series of theater workshops with Bya Braga,
theater professor from Belo Horizonte, and Adriano Moraes, of the FILO
organizing committee. A result of these workshops, which began in December
2001, was the performance for the May 2001 FILO Festival of Our Bakery,
which they described as a theatrical exercise drawing on the lived experience of
the MST farmers as well as German dramatist Bertolt Brecht's play The
Bakery. The original text dramatizes the struggle for daily survival of
urban unemployed gathered around a neighborhood bakery. The MST group
appropriated Brecht’s play as a starting point, or re-writeable text, to
portray the difficult reality of the rural settlement and the relationship
between newly settled Landless and the re-established rhythms of nature, of
planting and harvesting. The group also drew on familiar elements of
rural, popular culture, such as the Festival of the Dancing Bull
(boi-bumbá) and the more quotidian maté ritual (roda
de chimarrão). Through innovative staging involving a tractor
and trailer, the group realized their desire to take theatrical practice outside
of the fixed theater - an infrastructure rarely available to rural populations -
and bring it to other land reform occupations and settlements, where the land
itself becomes their stage.
In 2001, the MST’s national-level Culture Sector began an ambitious
partnership with the Rio de Janeiro-based Center for the Theater of the
Oppressed (CTO-Rio). While the two theater projects above represent relatively
isolated, local initiatives of Landless communities that have achieved a certain
stability with the formalization and maturity of their land reform settlements,
the MST-CTO partnership has begun to develop a theater project as a means of
dialogue and cultural expression to be spatialized and territorialized
throughout the movement along with its other organization and direct action
strategies. The project began with a series of workshops directed by
dramatist/activists from the CTO-Rio, including its artistic director and
founder, Augusto Boal.
The Theater of the Oppressed is a set of theatrical exercises, games and
dramatic forms developed by Augusto Boal and individuals and groups with
whom he has worked over the past three decades. They are meant to
promote awareness of one’s social situation, individual attitudes and
how our beings and bodies are bound by different levels of oppressions.
Intended for use by both actors and non-actors, the Theater of the
Oppressed most famously has been employed to empower marginalized
communities and groups, including prisoners, slum-dwellers, domestic
workers, developmentally and physically disabled, minorities, etc.
These groups are trained in the techniques of the Theater of the Oppressed
to explore and resolve the sources of their oppressions.
The workshops focused on training nineteen activists from fourteen states in
the methodology of the Theater of the Oppressed. Over the course of the
workshops, the activists formed the Patativa do Assaré National Brigade
of the Theater of the Oppressed.[8] The goal was for those activists to then return to their
settlements and camps to form local theater groups. The project has taken
off quickly and, like the mística, has the potential to become
one of the genres of symbolic production that significantly define and
interrogate Landlessness as a cultural identity. As the Patativa do
Assaré National Brigade declares in a collectively authored
manifesto:
ìAnd from this seed of resistance have sprouted 8 beautiful and
strong groups spread across the four corners of the country, and many others
in formation, denouncing oppression wherever it might be and showing that
art is politics, that it educates, mobilizes and helps to transform.î
(Patativa do Assaré National Theater Brigade of the MST 2002)
The methodology, know as Forum Theater, developed by Boal and the CTO-Rio and
appropriated by the MST Culture Sector activists, is particularly important in
evaluating the pedagogical and performative dimensions to this cultural project.
While clearly grounded in a commitment to exploring political problems and
individual and collective actions for confronting the micro- and macro-physics
of oppression, Augusto Boal attempts to carefully distinguish his methodology
from ìpropagandaî theater or plays that contain an explicit,
pedagogical message, with actors telling an audience how they should act or
behave. In Boal's estimation, propaganda theater is authoritarian and,
ultimately, by generally offering a packaged resolution to the problem presented
and reinforcing the passive spectatorship of the audience, does not lead to any
sort of real social change. Forum theater, in contrast, resists what Boal
sees as the enclosure of theater by presenting a problem, stopping, and then
inviting audience members to take the stage, to take the place of the
protagonist in any part of the play and act differently, attempting to resolve
the problem by improvising changes to the script. Thus, spectators become
what Boal calls ìspect-actorsî, and theater becomes a rehearsal for
action in real life. Boal’s guiding vision is the decentralization
of theater through the participatory democratization of access to the means of
theatrical production, emphasizing the potentially emancipatory dimensions of
the practice or process over the fixed message of a text or final product.
In a written introduction to the partnership with the MST, he further defines
the aesthetic dimensions of Theater of the Oppressed. Boal’s
statement on the creativity imposed by poverty attempts to turn on their head
pervasive critiques that the overt politicization of art inevitably leads to a
poverty of aesthetics:
ìAnd our aesthetic?
We have to keep in mind that the Image is Language and, as such, can
reinforce or contradict the language of the word. In order to use it
well, we have to insist upon a precise characterization of the Aesthetic
Space, and upon the ideological presence of hot objects, with the use of
basic, disposable or recyclable elements.
Our Aesthetic takes into account the fact that, due to the poverty of our
means, we are condemned to creativity.î (Boal 2002) [9]
The MST Brigade combines this vision with a specific intention of exploring
and constructing new dimensions of Landlessness as an identity of cultural
resistance. It also has begun a reflection upon the distinction between
theater within the context of a social movement and professional theater, as
well as the aesthetic dimensions to a politicized art. In two recent
manifesto/artist statements, the activists write:
ìWhen we conquer the techniques and the magic of the theater, we
put together and take apart the portrait of our own history, and thus, we
create the resistance necessary to continue in a struggle that is more
human, more conscious and more and more with our own face. When our
body expresses with levity and strength our ideals and values, we affirm
even more our LANDLESS identity. Every day creating more elements to
reaffirm who we are, what we do and in what we believe.î (Patativa do
Assaré National Theater Brigade of the MST 2002)
ìOur theater is different from professional and academic
theaters. Our objective is not an aesthetic of perfection, and we do
not represent what we are not. We incorporate into our scenes this
quotidian experience of struggle against authoritarianism, discrimination
and social marginalization, because this is the site of our speech, and we
are aware that if we do not speak of this, nobody will do it for us.
Thus, this is our aesthetic: incorporation of the precarious as a
constitutive element in a dynamic universe of conflicts, denunciation of the
extreme condition of misery to which Brazilian peasants are
subjected.î (Bôas 2002)
A level of pedagogical discourse runs through this project, as evidenced in
this last declaration’s relative delimitation of the themes to be
represented - misery, authoritarianism, discrimination, social marginalization -
and the identification of the artistic subjectivity or voice as that of the
peasantry. There is also a question of the extent to which the scripts
pedagogically guide the ìspect-actorsî to a particular resolution
of a particular problem. However, like the mística, the
form of cultural production offered through the methodology of the Theater of
the Oppressed, in particular that of Forum Theater, is open to limitless
variations informed by local aesthetic traditions and social realities and
different subjective voices that can speak to oppressions that arenít
necessarily to be reduced to the question of class. It is a form, in
particular given the space it allows for improvisation and public participation
in defining and attempting to resolve questions, that lends itself to a
horizontal, grassroots, performance of Landless identity in addition to a
vertical teaching of Landless identity.
For example, in Porto Alegre, during the second annual World Social
Forum in February 2002, the MST/CTO partnership introduced to the public,
in addition to the original Patativa do Assaré National Brigade, three
locally formed Theater of the Oppressed groups: the Mário Lago[10] Group from an occupation in
the state of São Paulo, Ocuparte from a settlement in the state of
Espírito Santo, and Velho Chico[11] from Ceará. The four different groups presented
quite different plays. Patativa do Assaré explored the difficulties
of a small-scale dairy farmer in negotiating a fair price for his milk in a
market dominated by a multinational commodities firm, the Italy-based Parmalat.
Velho Chico addressed the relationship between popular culture, which it
broadly defined in the form of cordel (a form of rhyming, oral poetry
traditionally identified with the rural Northeast), and the issue of genetically
modified crops. Mário Lago and Ocuparte both represented questions
of gender-based oppressions within poor families, one rural and one urban,
including the patriarchal division of education and work opportunities, alcohol
and drug use, domestic violence, sexual abuse and incest. All of the
groups drew upon different elements of humor, popular music and dance and
defined the performance space with carefully designed props that evoked the
aesthetics of precariousness referred to above.
Again, like the mística, the Theater of the Oppressed in the
MST is a project to be further studied, as a form of cultural production that,
as it travels and is reproduced, will reveal both a pedagogy and a performance
of Landlessness as a cultural identity and artistic subjectivity.
Plastic Arts
Preliminary documentary research on the plastic arts in the MST, including
painting, sculpture, and utilitarian and decorative crafts reveal this to be a
rich form of cultural expression for the Landless communities. It is a
very diverse and decentralized field of artistic activity in the movement,
drawing more on local or individual creative practices and, compared with
theater and the mística, defying a more unifying
characterization based upon a generic analysis. However, individual works
present a number of themes and symbols in common, many of which recall the
worldview of revolutionary romanticism described by Ridenti: a connection
between traditional values and lifestyles and a collective project of ambitious
social transformation, a conjugation of past and future utopian visions.
The paintings depict the peasantry as subject with clear objectives, defiantly
approaching barbed wire fences, the landscape as a constant source of meaning,
contrasting barrenness and exuberant fertility, a harmonious balance between
female and male protagonists, and a dreamlike, magical vision of life and
nature.
For example, an unsigned and untitled oil painting displayed in the
MST’s Brasília offices, is a head and shoulders portrait of three
peasants, their expressions serious, their eyes revealing a strong
determination, the physicality and dignity of their work inscribed in the lines
of their faces. An additional element solidifies the meaning of this
social realist portrait: a string of barbed wire crosses the
painting. Within this painting there is a presentation of a social ill:
the enclosure of the peasantry, presented here almost as an
incarceration, by the fences of private property. There is also a
proposal for action to resolve that ill: the figure in the middle is clenching
the barbed wire with two strong fists, and the viewer is narratively left with
the sense that the peasants are prepared to pull down the fence.
An unsigned collage/painting from Espírito Santo displayed during the
National Week of Brazilian Culture and Agrarian Reform is much more enigmatic
but equally powerful. Reminiscent of surrealist collage, this intensely
personal work draws on an eclectic set of images celebrating both the natural
environment and the human desire for its transcendence, through spiritual and
technological invention and faith. Images of animals, a martyred saint,
and the fiery take-off of a space shuttle emerge from an intense, green wash of
rainforest. The work seems to express a wonder for nature and human
endeavor. However, it simultaneously implies a contrast between
technology and nature, with a foreboding sense of a destructive alienation of
humanity from both nature and spirituality.
The potential difference in these expressions of revolutionary romanticism
from that of the predominantly middle-class, urban-based, intellectual and
artistic movements of the 1960s and their pedagogical representations of an
exploited and potentially revolutionary peasantry, is the degree of
self-representation, more based upon the lived experiences and symbolic universe
of poor, rural communities. For example, this includes a stronger element
of (predominantly Christian) religiosity than the 1960s intellectuals generally
allowed for. However, does this question of representativity inevitably
transform into a very thorny one of authenticity? That is, who has the
right to represent Landlessness, and, even, who has the right to be Landless?
These are questions that opponents of the MST rhetorically employ in
attempts to disqualify it, criticizing the leadership as disconnected from the
actual goals and worldview of the individuals and families that make up its
activist base and, more precisely, attempting to disqualify the urban poor from
inclusion in agrarian reform projects (while in parts of Brazil, the MST has
organized among poor, peripheral urban communities).
If the plastic arts so far documented have something to teach us, it is the
fluidity of Landlessness as an identifying marker. I thus resist the move
toward biography as the best strategy for analyzing cultural production in the
MST. However, in order to read the multiplicities and complexities of
meaning in individual works, much more information is needed on the individual
artists, their experiences and creative practices both in and out of the
movement, and the contextualization or positioning of their individual works
within relevant local, regional, national traditions of cultural
expression. This research is yet to be done, and the individual works so
far documented - exhibited in MST state offices, the Agrarian Reform Store in
São Paulo, or during the recent Week of Brazilian Culture and
Agrarian Reform in Rio de Janeiro - are shrouded in relative anonymity,
most of them without a title or year, and many of them unsigned, or signed only
with a first name.
Mural Painting
A field of the plastic arts that has developed a bit more cohesively and
offers different opportunities for interpretation as a genre and as an emerging
body of work in the MST is mural painting. Murals in the movement have
become a significant presence marking regional- and national-level congresses,
and as such they have been more consistently documented and photographed.
Apart from their content, as catalogues of markers of Landless identity, their
history as a genre and the conditions of their production and placement in the
movement can tell us a great deal about the cultural politics and production of
the MST.
Muralism, during and following its revival in the context of revolutionary
Mexico, was regarded as an important, culturally democratizing form of public
art. Its accessibility to a wide audience - in terms of its location
outside of the privatized or semi-privatized spaces of the museum, the gallery,
and the individual collection and in terms of the decipherability of its overtly
allegorical and Manichean content - is the basis for the genre’s commonly
regarded revolutionary, anti-bourgeois nature. As one of its greatest
practitioners and advocates in Mexico, David Alfaro Siqueiros, declared in a
1923 manifesto:
ìWe repudiate so-called easel painting and every kind of art
favored by ultra-intellectual circles, because it is aristocratic, and we
praise monumental art in all its forms, because it is public property.
We proclaim at this time of social change from a decrepit order to a new
one, the creators of beauty must use their best efforts to produce
ideological works for the people; art must no longer be the expression of
individual satisfaction (which) it is today, but should aim to become a
fighting educative art for allî (quoted in Rochfort 1993,
6).
Stressing their accessibility to and representation of the People as the
vanguard expression of cultural democratization, mural projects spread across
Latin America over the subsequent decades, including Brazil.[12] Apart from the celebration of the
people as the protagonists of a modern, nation-building project, muralism in
many of its manifestations was also regarded as a spiritual endeavor, in this
sense a romantic narration of the modernization drastically transforming
society. The Mexican painter and critic often noted as the ideological
precursor and theoretical proponent of Mexican muralism, Gerardo Murillo
(1875-1964, better known by his adopted Nahuatl name of Dr. Atl), admired the
murals of the Italian renaissance not so much as a model for a social,
pedagogical art. Instead, in the frescoes of Michelangelo and Leonardo he
found his conception of spiritualism and spontaneous energy in art, which he
considered to be the basis for a Mexican modernism. (Rochfort 18).
The murals of the Sandinista Revolution in Nicaragua (1979-1990) also reflect
the genre’s strong connection to the spiritual and radical humanist
dimensions of revolutionary romanticism. These works, many of which were
systematically destroyed following the military and electoral defeat of the
revolution, bring together Christian and social-realist iconography, and they
represent the force of Liberation Theology in defining the aesthetics of a
particular moment of radical social transformation.
These legacies help to define the historical and aesthetic context within
which muralism has developed as a significant form of cultural production in the
MST. A review of these murals reveals a consistent set of markers of
Landless identity that are closely tied to the radical humanism and spirituality
of revolutionary romanticism: a dichotomy of quickly identifiable elements
of human emancipation and oppression - abundance versus hunger, sharing versus
greed, education versus illiteracy, guns versus tools, etc.; the People -
men, women, peasants, workers, families, even children - as the protagonists of
History; pastoral harmony between human and natural environments.
Liberation Theology is a clear source of inspiration and iconography for this
work, and many of the murals are produced in co-operation with individuals from
the Movimento dos Artistas da Caminhada (Movement of Artists of the
March), a lay group of Christian artists/activists that acts in solidarity with
social movements in Brazil. These murals are a relatively more pedagogical
and centralizing cultural production of Landless identity. Given their
monumental scale and their privileged location at congresses or settlement
buildings, their very existence is a tribute to the territorialization of the
movement. Like murals in the other contexts briefly described above, they
represent revolutionary romanticism as it achieves (or is absorbed by) a
relatively high level of institutional power.[13]
This understanding of muralism as a more clearly pedagogical than
performative production of Landless identity is a point upon which to draw a
general conclusion on cultural politics and production in the MST. What
seems vital in understanding the dynamics of symbolic production of Landlessness
is the recognition that both modes of representation, the pedagogical and the
performative, are present. Neither mode can fully displace the other in a
social movement and collective project of the scale of the MST. The
tensions in the MST at an organizational level between the stability afforded by
centralized institutionalization and the grassroots energies sustained by a
vertical decentralization are partially revealed by the movement’s
diverse modes of cultural production. The plastic and performing arts, as
growing fields of cultural production in the MST, reveal complex dynamics of
symbolic production and identity construction. They are cultural
processes through which a diversity of people learn to be Landless and
Landlessness learns to become a diversity of people with a fundamentally human
desire for creative self-expression.
[1] The authors propose six
types of romanticism: restitutionist, advocating the restoration of a
medieval past; conservative, seeking to legitimate and maintain the present
social order, based upon a supposedly natural socio-historical evolution;
fascist, combining a critique of capitalist rationality with a condemnation of
liberal democracy and communism, glorifying force, submission of the individual
to the community, and nostalgia for a mythic past of conquest and violence;
resigned, lamenting modernity but recognizing it as an inalterable fact;
reformist, proposing certain reforms to rescue disappearing values; and
revolutionary or utopian, that seeks to achieve a new future, in which humanity
is able to re-establish a selection of qualities and values lost to modernity, a
goal which necessitates the radical critique of the capitalist economic system.
(Ridenti 2000, 28-29)
[2] The further sub-division of
revolutionary romanticisms includes: jacobin-democratic; populist;
utopian-humanist socialism; libertarian; and Marxist. (Ridenti 2000,
29-30)
[3] For a brief,
anthropological analysis of the rituals and symbols of the MST, see Bonin and
Kersten, 1993.
[4] In an article that
contrasts the personal trajectories of two Landless activists, Marcelo Carvalho
Rosa concludes that ìthe essence of the MST in actuality is made of this
complementarity - perhaps contradictory - between common people and political
activists, between the quotidian and the spectacle.î (84)
[5] The penname of Hamilton
Pereira (1948), author of a number of collections of poetry, including:
Poemas do povo da noite (Poems of the People of the Night) (1978),
Água de rebelião (Rebellion Water) (1983),
Passarinhar (Songbirding) (1993).
[6] Bosi, quoted in Caldart and
Kolling 2000, 2.
[7] For more on this general
understanding of mística,, see the collection of essays
published by the MST, Mística: Uma necessidade no trabalho
popular e organizativo (Mística: A Necessity for Popular
Organization (1998), including Ranulfo Pelloso’s ìThe Force
that Animates Activists,î Ademar Bogo’s ìHow to Improve our
Mística,î and Leonardo Boff’s ìTo Nourish
our Mística.î
[8] The theater group’s
name pays homage to the poet and lyricist, Antônio Gonçalves da
Silva, known as Patativa (a Brazilian songbird) do Assaré. Born in
1909 to peasant parents in Assaré, Ceará, he has become one of the
most widely known representatives of a form of oral and chapbook poetry common
to the Brazilian northeast. His work often treats the hardships,
injustices, and symbolic universe of peasant life.
[9] Boal has written
extensively on the development of Forum Theater and other methodologies of the
Theater of the Oppressed in a number of different countries and contexts.
See, for example, The Theater of the Oppressed (1979), Games for
Actors and Non-Actors (1992), and The Rainbow of Desire
(1995).
[10] Named in honor of the
poet, actor, lyricist and activist from the Rio de Janeiro, Mário Lago
(1911-2002), whose work includes a number of sambas, marches, foxtrots, and
tangos as well as eleven books of poetry and memoirs.
[11] Reference to the
nickname of the São Francisco, a major waterway running through a number
of Brazil’s northeastern states.
[12] Brazilian muralists who
have achieved national and international recognition and commissions include:
Cândido Portinari (Rio de Janeiro, Belo Horizonte, São Paulo,
Brasília, etc.), Athos Bulcão (Brasília), and Francisco
Brennand (Recife and Salvador).
[13] This institutional power
is more often represented by the Church, the State, or the Political Party who
provide resources and designate the public spaces for this type of public
art. For this reason, despite its popular, revolutionary content, a number
of critics view it as largely a paternalistic, centralizing genre. See,
for example, Octavio Paz’s assessment of the Mexican muralists ([1978]
1993) and Nelly Richardsí critique of the Brigadas Muralistas
led by Francisco Brugnoli and the Brigada Ramona Parra in Chile from
the mid-1950s to the early 1970s (1986). While both critics effectively
point out the limitations of this conception of cultural democratization , I
would argue that they fail somewhat to appreciate the genre’s
contribution to the debate and amplification of the notion of cultural
democratization. While today, that notion is understood in terms of
participatory access to the means of cultural production, as opposed to simply
changing the representational modes of a privileged artistic class, muralism
might be understood as an important step in that direction.
Bibliography
Barcellos, Jalusa. CPC da UNE: Uma história de paixão
e consciência. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Frontera, 1994.
Bhabha, Homi. The Location of Culture. London: Routledge,
1994.
Boal, Augusto. Games for Actors and Non-Actors. London: Routledge,
1992.
_______. Theatre of the Oppressed. New York: Theatre
Communications Group, 1995.
_______. The Rainbow of Desire: The Boal Method of Theatre and
Therapy. London: Routledge, 1995.
Bôas, Rafael Villas. ìO Teatro do Oprimido no
Acampamento Nacional Eldorado dos Carajás.î
Metáxis: A Revista Internacional do Teatro do Oprimido no. 2
(forthcoming, 2002).
Bogo, Ademar. O MST e a cultura: Caderno de
formação n° 34. São Paulo:
Associação Nacional de Cooperação Agrícola,
2000.
Bonin, Anamaria Aimoré and Márcia Scholz de Andrade
Kersten. ìO significado dos ritos e símbolos para o movimento
dos sem-terra: Abordagem preliminar.î In Agricultures et
paysanneries en Amérique Latine: Mutations et recompositions, ed.
Thierry Linck. Paris: Éditions de l'Orstom, 1993.
Bosi, Alfredo. Dialética da
colonização. São Paulo: Companhia das
Letras, 1992.
Buarque de Hollanda, Heloisa. Impressões de viagem, CPC, vanguarda
e desbunde: 1960/1970. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Brasiliense, 1980.
Caldart, Roseli Salete and Edgar Kolling. ìConstruir o
Método para Impulsionar a Revolução Cultural no MST:
Elementos de estudo e debate.î Unpublished paper presented during the
Reunião da Coordenação Nacional - Região Sul,
Chapecó, Santa Catarina, March 21-23, 2000.
Coelho, Teixeira. O que é ação cultural.
São Paulo: Brasiliense, 1988.
MST. Mística: Uma necessidade no trabalho popular e
organizativo: Caderno de formação n° 27. São
Paulo: Movimento dos Trabalhadores Rurais Sem Terra - MST, 1998.
Patativa do Assaré National Theater Brigade of the
MST. ìOccupy, Resist, Produce.î
Metáxis: International Magazine of the Theater of the
Oppressed. Forthcoming, 2002.
Paz, Octavio. Essays on Mexican Art. New York: Harcourt Brace
& Company, 1993.
Richard, Nelly. Margins and Institutions: Art in Chile Since
1973. Melbourne: Art and Text, 1986.
Ridenti, Marcelo. Em busca do povo brasileiro: Artistas da
revolução brasileira, do CPC à era da tv. Rio de
Janeiro: Editora Record, 2000.
Rochfort, Desmond. Mexican Muralists: Orozco, Rivera,
Siqueiros. San Francisco: Chronicle Books, 1993.
Rosa, Marcelo Carvalho. ìEspetáculo e cotidiano:
Pequenas vozes na luta do MST.î Cultura Vozes 3 (May-June
2001).
Williams, Raymond. ìCulture is Ordinary.î In The Politics of
Culture: Policy Perspectives for Individuals, Institutions and
Communities, ed. Gigi Bradford, Michael Gary and Glenn Wallach. New York:
The New Press, 2000.
|